|
Niles Bolton Associates; Anderson Brule Architects Project of Distinction Winner 2006 Education Design Showcase
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Facility Use: College/University 4-Year Institution Project Type: New Construction Category: Residence Halls (College Only) Location: San Jose, CA District/Inst.: San Jose State University Tony Valenzuela Facilities Development & Operation Completion Date: August 2005 Design Capacity: 2,279 students Enrollment: 29,000 students Gross Area: 960,662 sq.ft. Space per pupil: 422 sq.ft. Site size: 6 acres Cost per student: $90,390 Cost per sq.ft.: $214.00 Total project cost: $206,000,000 Building construction cost: $153,800,000 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
The Fall 2005 completion of San Jose State University Campus Village signaled a major step in transforming the campus from a commuter school to a true urban university. The 2,279 beds are the first component of 3 planned phases that will eventually total over 5,000 beds.
Three multi-story buildings rise above two levels of sub-grade parking and provide apartment-style housing for students, faculty, and staff. At over 960,000sf, the Campus Village consists of 7-story, 8-story, and 15-story concrete structures grouped around landscaped courtyards.
Village Goals and Objectives The University and Housing Department staff were specifically goal oriented in their direction to the project team:
- Provide convenient on-campus housing for students, faculty and staff.
- Replace old, outdated dorm type units with apartments and suites which meet the market demands of current students and their parents.
- Foster a sense of community and an enriching learning environment.
- Provide a quality living environment for targeted residential groups: freshman, undergraduates, faculty, and staff.
- Establish a long term positive impact on students and faculty which will help to transform a “commuter” campus to one with a vibrant on-campus living and learning environment.
The team embraced these goals when designing the project. The Village more than doubles the amount of on-campus housing previously available at the University, and mixes students and faculty in a unique community environment.
Common areas include a conference and recreation center, laundry facilities, computer center, video gaming center, and Village store and cafe for the village residents. New offices for the San Jose State University Housing Services department are also integrated into the complex.
Inviting, Vibrant Residential Community Each of the three main structures has its own unique vernacular and sense of place, yet is comprised of the same warm, contextual building materials already existing on campus including brick, stucco, and terra-cotta colored roofing. The campus bridges an urban downtown environment with inviting residential neighborhoods. The Village uses arched forms, sloped roofs, and familiar architectural elements to complement the traditional California-style architecture existing in the downtown area and on campus.
Inviting courtyards are especially designed and landscaped with varieties of trees, shrubs and grasses. Paved walkways and plazas connect the buildings. A variety of exterior spaces are provided for the residents from the volleyball court in front of the freshman building, to the group seating and eating areas in front of the central building, to the relaxing, shaded bench seating in front of the faculty/staff building. A formal court incorporating a water feature organizes and defines the primary site entrance to the campus and is designed for larger gatherings.
The new Village has brought a renewed sense of place to the established campus. Students are excited to live on campus in a close-knit environment which fosters exceptional learning. The complex was designed with state of the art technology as a significant component. “Fiber to the pillow” was the tag-line for the design team. All of the buildings are fully air conditioned and equipped with a state-of-the-art fiber optic network which brings computer internet connectivity, telephone, cable TV, and video gaming to each unit bedroom.
The University embraced reality of changing technologies during the design and construction phase. Over the 4 years from masterplanning to opening, the University switched from CAT 5 cable to fiber optics to provide residents the latest in communications and technology.
Apartment Configuration The project’s three separate buildings rest on an elevated podium slab over two levels of underground parking for approximately 700 cars. The 7-story freshman building houses 76 suite style units. Each suit unit contains four double occupancy bedrooms with the eight students sharing two bathrooms, a living area and small kitchen space.
The upper classman building extends in height from nine to fifteen stories and houses 356 three, four, and five bedroom apartment style units. The most prevalent apartment unit contains four single occupancy bedrooms with the four students sharing a bathroom, a living and dining space, and a full kitchen. Most of the amenity and support function spaces for the complex and the Housing Services offices are located on the lower two floors of this structure.
The 8-story faculty/staff building provides 98 apartments of one bedroom, two bedroom, and efficiency units. This building contains an unique unit with interconnecting doors which allows the University flexibility in creating various combinations of one, two bedroom, and efficiency units.
Creative Approach to Project Development The Village was first conceived as a Developer driven project, but was transformed to a traditional design-bid-build package to take advantage of the California State University System’s competitive bond financing. The project delivery resulted in more “building” and “amenities” being provided for the original budget.
Creative Use of Construction Materials The structures were designed using a cast concrete frame with elevated post tensioned concrete slabs. The buildings and parking structure all sit on a concrete mat foundation which varies in thickness from thirty inches to six feet and occupies an entire square city block.
Brick is the primary building skin material for the first two floors of the buildings with the upper floors being enclosed with glass fiber reinforced concrete (GFRC) panels. Cast stone and precast concrete are used as trim materials such as window sills, cornices, and window surrounds. Sloped standing seam metal roofing is used on the buildings lower portions to add a residential character to this large scale project. Vertical ribbons of curtainwall in living spaces are used to break up the building massing and contrast with individual operable windows in the unit bedrooms.
The use of light-weight Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) panels helped speed erection. The fabricator was able to form the panels in a large size, due to the light weight nature of the material. The construction team was able to hang between 5,000-7,000 sf of curtain wall per day utilizing the efficient pre-fabricated concrete panels.
Cast stone shapes at the base of the building were used, while GFRC shapes were designed into the building’s upper stories. The project designers created unique cornice and architectural banding with the GFRC to respond to San Jose’s unique vernacular style.
Significant Challenges and Solutions The project faced many significant challenges which included a tight urban site and a high water table. The Campus Village site, a full city block, is bordered by high-traffic streets on two sides and major campus pedestrian paths on the other. During construction, public street closures and lane reductions were required. Construction workers were shuttled to the site from a remote parking lot, while equipment staging and material deliveries had to be carefully coordinated.
The water table in San Jose, California is high, only 6 feet under grade. The project’s tight site mandated underground parking, which reached down 22 feet. Dewatering shafts were drilled every 20' around the entire city-block site and the contractor continually ran pumps 24-7. At first a mud slab was poured to get construction out of the mud and to create a flat, dry surface. Then a waterproofing layer was added and ultimately, an actual mat-slab. Concrete was poured for 3 days. Pumps were continually running and could only be turned off after the pouring of the project’s 3rd level. If the pumps had been turned off earlier, there was not enough weight in the structure to keep it from floating up, given the extent of the water pressure.
Project Description: 1) Control of Institution: Public 2) Type of Institution: Traditional |
Locale: Methodology & Standards: Funding Method(s): | Primary Source: Primary Source: Revenue Bonds |
Project Delivery Method(s): Sustainable/Green Design: Architect(s): Associated Firms and Consultants: Interior Design: Niles Bolton Associates; Anderson Brule Architects Landscape Architecture: Wallace Roberts & Todd General Contractor: Clark Construction Structural Engineer: Culp & Tanner, Inc. Electrical Engineer: Flack + Kurtz, Inc. Civil Engineer: Nolte Associates, Inc. Safety Consultant: Tomasi-Dubois (Security Consultant) Other: Jones Lang LaSalle (Program Manager); Salas O'Brien Engineers (MEP Engineer / Infrastructure); Walker Parking Consultants (Parking Consultant); Elevator Advisors (Elevator Consultant) |
Area Map: |